On 2016-08-18 17:35:47 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> I can review this next week. > > > > Thanks > > Given the time frame that you have in mind, I won't revisit the > question the parallel CLUSTER CPU bottleneck issue until this is > committed. The patch might change things enough that that would be a > waste of time.
How large was the index & table in question? I mean this really only comes into effect at 100+ segments. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
