Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I don't have strong feelings about this. Technically, this issue > affects 9.5 also, because pqmq.c was introduced in that release. I > don't think we want to add another error field in a released branch. > However, since there's no parallel query in 9.5, only people who are > accessing that functionality via extension code would be affected, > which might be nobody and certainly isn't a lot of people, so we could > just leave this unfixed in 9.5.
After sleeping on it, I think the right answer is to introduce the new error-message field (and not worry about 9.5). Will work on a patch for that, unless I hear objections pretty soon. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers