Alvaro Herrera <> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any objections?  Anyone want to bikeshed the field name?  I considered
>> on PG_DIAG_SEVERITY_ASCII, but I can't say I'm in love with that.

> I didn't review the patch, but +1 on the idea.  As for the name, I think
> ASCII is the wrong thing (as many labels in other languages can be in
> ascii too).  I vote for NONLOCALIZED.

> I see character "s" is already taken in the protocol; that would be my
> first preference rather than A.  How about Z?

One of the reasons I didn't pick NONLOCALIZED was that I couldn't come
up with an appropriate letter for the protocol.  I guess Z is okay,
but it's a bit of a stretch (especially if you're of the persuasion
that wants to spell it "nonlocalised").  Maybe V for "seVerity"?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to