Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Any objections? Anyone want to bikeshed the field name? I considered >> PG_DIAG_SEVERITY_NONLOCALIZED and PG_DIAG_SEVERITY_ENGLISH before settling >> on PG_DIAG_SEVERITY_ASCII, but I can't say I'm in love with that.
> I didn't review the patch, but +1 on the idea. As for the name, I think > ASCII is the wrong thing (as many labels in other languages can be in > ascii too). I vote for NONLOCALIZED. > I see character "s" is already taken in the protocol; that would be my > first preference rather than A. How about Z? One of the reasons I didn't pick NONLOCALIZED was that I couldn't come up with an appropriate letter for the protocol. I guess Z is okay, but it's a bit of a stretch (especially if you're of the persuasion that wants to spell it "nonlocalised"). Maybe V for "seVerity"? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers