On 2016-08-30 08:46:48 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I was toying with a couple of ideas that would involve changing the
> storage of sequences.  (Say, for the sake of discussion, removing the
> problematic/useless sequence_name field.)

I'd be quite interested to know what changes that are...

> I think the other solution mentioned in that thread would also work:
> Have pg_upgrade treat sequences more like system catalogs, whose format
> changes between major releases, and transferred them via the
> dump/restore route.  So instead of copying the disk files, issue a
> setval call, and the sequence should be all set up.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to