Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Oh, and we've previously re-added that based on > complaints. C.f. d543170f2fdd6d9845aaf91dc0f6be7a2bf0d9e7 (and others > IIRC).
That one wasn't about row order per se, but I agree that people *will* bitch if we change the behavior, especially if we don't provide a way to fix it. ORDER BY is not a useful suggestion when there is nothing you could order by to get the old behavior. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers