On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > But I don't understand the reason behind such a restriction to be
> > honest because libxml2 does not depend on libxslt. The contrary is
> > true: libxslt needs libxml2.
> Right.

Pretty sure this goes back to *our* XML support requiring both. As in you
couldn't turn on/off xslt independently, so the "xml requires xslt" comment
is that *our* xml support required both.

This may definitely not be true anymore, and that check has just not been

Also this was 10 years ago, so I'm of course not 100% sure, but I think it
was something like that...

 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Reply via email to