On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward > compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum > after introduced quorum. > I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2, > n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.
Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be GA soon. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
