On 09/09/16 08:23, Vik Fearing wrote:
On 09/09/2016 03:28 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
"k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
after introduced quorum.
I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.
Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does
not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be
Indeed. I'll vote for pulling a fast one on 9.6 for this.
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: