On 09/09/2016 03:28 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward >> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum >> after introduced quorum. >> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2, >> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus. > > Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does > not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be > GA soon.
Indeed. I'll vote for pulling a fast one on 9.6 for this. -- Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36 http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
