Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > If we take a policy to try to imitate the behavior of some > > reference platform (specifically Linux) on other platforms, this > > is required disguising. Another potential policy on this problem > > is "following the platform's behavior". From this viewpoint, this > > message should be shown to users because Windows says > > so. Especially for socket operations, the simultion layer is > > intending the former for non-error behaviors, but I'm not sure > > about the behaviors on errors. > > The more you hack windows, the more you'll notice that it is full of > caveats, behavior exceptions, and that it runs in its way as nothing > else in this world... This patch looks like a tempest in a teapot at > the end. Why is it actually a problem to show this message? Just > useless noise? If that's the only reason let's drop the patch and move > on.
Yeah, I looked into this a few days ago and that was my conclusion also: let's drop this. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers