Hello, At Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:00:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in <20160913130032.GA391646@alvherre.pgsql> > Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > If we take a policy to try to imitate the behavior of some > > > reference platform (specifically Linux) on other platforms, this > > > is required disguising. Another potential policy on this problem > > > is "following the platform's behavior". From this viewpoint, this > > > message should be shown to users because Windows says > > > so. Especially for socket operations, the simultion layer is > > > intending the former for non-error behaviors, but I'm not sure > > > about the behaviors on errors. > > > > The more you hack windows, the more you'll notice that it is full of > > caveats, behavior exceptions, and that it runs in its way as nothing > > else in this world... This patch looks like a tempest in a teapot at > > the end. Why is it actually a problem to show this message? Just > > useless noise? If that's the only reason let's drop the patch and move > > on. > > Yeah, I looked into this a few days ago and that was my conclusion also: > let's drop this.
Ok, I greed. Thanks. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers