On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.peder...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > For the archives, this patch conflicts with the WAL patch [1]. > > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JS%2BSiRSQBzEFp > nsSmxZKingrRH7WNyWULJeEJSj1-%3D0w%40mail.gmail.com >
Updated the patch it applies over Amit's concurrent hash index[1] and Amit's wal for hash index patch[2] together. [1] Concurrent Hash index. <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1J6b8O4PcEPqRxNYbLVbfToNMJEEm%2Bqn0jZX31-obXrJw%40mail.gmail.com> [2] Wal for hash index. <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JS%2BSiRSQBzEFpnsSmxZKingrRH7WNyWULJeEJSj1-%3D0w%40mail.gmail.com> -- Thanks and Regards Mithun C Y EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
cache_hash_index_metapage_onAmit_05_02_with_wall.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
