On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
 > I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
of wal

Adding the rebased patch over [1] + [2]

[1] Concurrent Hash index.
[2] Wal for hash index.

Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: cache_hash_index_metapage_onAmit_05_03_with_wall.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to