On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Mithun Cy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
> of wal
>
> Adding the rebased patch over [1] + [2]
>
> [1] Concurrent Hash index.
> [2] Wal for hash index.

Moved to next CF.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to