On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Thomas Munro
>> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, if they really are independent then shouldn't we take advantage of
>>> that at call sites where we might be idle but we might also be waiting
>>> for the network?
>> I certainly didn't intend for them to be independent, and I don't
>> think they should be.  I think it should be a hierarchy - as it is
>> currently.  I think it's a bad idea to introduce the notational
>> overhead of having to pass through two integers rather than one
>> everywhere, and a worse idea to encourage people to think of the
>> wait_event_type and wait_event are related any way other than
>> hierarchically.
> So should I change back the patch to have only one argument for the
> eventId, and guess classId from it?

Why would you need to guess?  But, yes, I think one argument is much preferable.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to