On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> writes: >>> I've always been wondering why we don't set a log_line_prefix by >>> default. >> >> I think the odds of getting to something that everyone would agree on >> are nil, so I'm not excited about getting into that particular >> bikeshed-painting discussion. Look at the amount of trouble we're >> having converging on a default for the regression tests, which are >> a far narrower use-case than "everybody". > > Well, practically anything that includes a PID and the timestamp is > going to be an improvement over the status quo. Just because we can't > all agree on what would be perfect does not mean that we can't do > better than what we've got now. +1 for trying.
Is there any chance we can move forward here, or is this effort doomed for now? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
