Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> As long as we get %t and %p in there we're going to be way ahead, really.

Could we get consensus on just changing the default to

        log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] '

and leaving the rest out of it?  I think pretty much everybody agrees
that those fields are useful, whereas the rest of it is a lot more
context-dependent.  (For example, there are a whole lot of real
installations where neither %u nor %d would be worth the log space.)

Personally I'm also on board with using this for regression testing:

        log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] %q%a '

but I doubt it can be sold as a general-purpose default.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to