2016-09-28 18:57 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > 2016-09-28 16:03 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> >> I propose to push my current patch (ie, move PL function
> >> source code to \df+ footers), and we can use it in HEAD for awhile
> >> and see what we think. We can alway improve or revert it later.
> > I had some objection to format of source code - it should be full source
> > code, not just header and body.
> That would be redundant with stuff that's in the main part of the \df
> display. I really don't need to see the argument types twice, for
I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to
I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
> regards, tom lane