Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+ >> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output >> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it >> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking >> anyone's scripts, that's for sure. >> >> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to >> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.
> I agree with everything Alvaro just said. Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing. Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers