On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
>> On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
>>> altogether.  I stand by that.  People who are used to seeing the output
>>> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
>>> out, at which point it's no longer a problem.  We're not breaking
>>> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>>> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
>>> footers.  I'm -1 on doing nothing.
>> I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
> Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that?  People
> did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but
> maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing.
> Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...

Let's remove it and move on then. By looking again at this thread and
(thanks Stephen for the summary) that's where we are heading to.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to