On 2016/10/03 13:26, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote >> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE. Does the following look good or am I still >>> missing something? >> >> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine. > > I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched > the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs > review".
Thanks Michael. I was going to post the patch addressing Robert's comments today, which I will anyway. Then I will switch the status back to "Needs Review", albeit as part of the next CF. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
