On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct  6, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I decided to do some testing on hydra (IBM-provided community
>> resource, POWER, 16 cores/64 threads, kernel 3.2.6-3.fc16.ppc64) using
>> the newly-enhanced wait event stuff to try to get an idea of what
>> we're waiting for during pgbench.  I did 30-minute pgbench runs with
>> various configurations, but all had max_connections = 200,
>> shared_buffers = 8GB, maintenance_work_mem = 4GB, synchronous_commit =
>> off, checkpoint_timeout = 15min, checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9,
>> log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] ', max_wal_size = 40GB, log_checkpoints =
>> on.  During each run, I ran this psql script in another window and
>> captured the output:
> This is a great study that shows how the new instrumentation has given
> us a new window into performance.  I am frankly surprised we got as far
> as we did in finding performance bottlenecks before we had this
> instrumentation.

Thanks, and +1.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to