> Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
> Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved. 

I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
people use/want to update a join of some type?  I thought that SQL99 allowed
updating view created by joins.

In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good 
thing or a bad thing?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to