On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:39, Eric D Nielsen wrote:
> > Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
> > 
> > Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved. 
> I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
> people use/want to update a join of some type?  I thought that SQL99 allowed
> updating view created by joins.
> In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good 
> thing or a bad thing?

Lets try to meet the spec first, then debate about whether extending it
is a good or bad thing :)


PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to