On 10/12/2016 05:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of >> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of >> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end. I really meant so submit a patch >> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me. >> >> Any objections to removing the option in 10? > > I'm not sure I see the point.
Redusing the number of configuration variables is an a-priori good. In aggregate, the more knobs we have, the harder it is to learn how to admin Postgres. Therefore any time a config variable becomes obsolete, we should remove it. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers