On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of > the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of > vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end. I really meant so submit a patch > to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me. > > Any objections to removing the option in 10?
I'm not sure I see the point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers