Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Is pg_xact actually better than pg_clog?
Yes, because it doesn't contain the three letters "log". We have the two precedents "pg_subtrans" and "pg_multixact", so unless we want to get into renaming those too, I think "pg_trans" and "pg_xact" are really the only options worth considering. Personally I'd go for "pg_trans", but it's only a weak preference. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers