Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> dromedary seems to have found one, or at least an unstable test result.
> OK, looking at that now. Thanks. Looking at further failures, it looks like 32-bit machines in general get that result. Might be just a cost estimation difference. Also, some of the windows machines are folding "sqrt(2)" to a different constant than is hard-wired into the expected-result file. That's slightly annoying because it calls into question whether we can ship floating-point computations to the far end at all :-(. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers