Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Uh, sorry. My proposal a couple of years back was to put the > relfilenode, not the name. I didn't notice that it was the name being > proposed here. However, now I notice that this idea doesn't solve the > problem for mapped relations.
Well, as long as a catalog lookup would be required anyway, what about putting in the table OID? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers