On October 22, 2016 11:59:15 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Uh, sorry.  My proposal a couple of years back was to put the
>> relfilenode, not the name.  I didn't notice that it was the name
>> proposed here.  However, now I notice that this idea doesn't solve
>> problem for mapped relations.
>Well, as long as a catalog lookup would be required anyway, what about
>putting in the table OID?

How about storing two table names? The old and what the relation is being 
renamed to? We wouldn't be able to tell after a crash which is which, but 
that'll usually still be helpful.   Every rename would clear out the old/wrong 
one, and add the target filename.


Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to