On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Kuntal Ghosh > <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> - Another suggestion was to remove wal_consistency from PostgresNode.pm >> because small buildfarm machines may suffer on it. Although I've no >> experience in this matter, I would like to be certain that nothings breaks >> in recovery tests after some modifications. > > I think running the whole test suite with this enabled is going to > provoke complaints from buildfarm owners. That's too bad, because I > agree with you that it would be nice to have the test coverage, but it > seems that many of the buildfarm machines are VMs with very minimal > resource allocations -- or very old physical machines -- or running > with settings like CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS that make runs very slow. If > you blow on them too hard, they fall over. > Thanks Robert. I got your point. Then, as Michael has suggested, it is nice to have some environment variable to pass optional conf parameters during tap-tests. Implementing this feature actually solves the problem.
-- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
