On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > - Another suggestion was to remove wal_consistency from PostgresNode.pm > because small buildfarm machines may suffer on it. Although I've no > experience in this matter, I would like to be certain that nothings breaks > in recovery tests after some modifications.
I think running the whole test suite with this enabled is going to provoke complaints from buildfarm owners. That's too bad, because I agree with you that it would be nice to have the test coverage, but it seems that many of the buildfarm machines are VMs with very minimal resource allocations -- or very old physical machines -- or running with settings like CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS that make runs very slow. If you blow on them too hard, they fall over. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
