Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > As noted in a nearby review of some similar code[1], commit 7a2fe9bd > made merge append very slightly more efficient, but nobody told > cost_merge_append about the change. I doubt it makes much difference > to the final cost in practice but I figured it might be worth > correcting the comment. Does this make sense?
Agreed, pushed. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers