Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> As noted in a nearby review of some similar code[1], commit 7a2fe9bd
> made merge append very slightly more efficient, but nobody told
> cost_merge_append about the change. I doubt it makes much difference
> to the final cost in practice but I figured it might be worth
> correcting the comment. Does this make sense?
Agreed, pushed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
