> So if I understand correctly, all instances of anyarray and anyelement > in a function definition would need to be self-consistent, but the group > could represent essentially any datatype with its corresponding array > type. If we need more than one of these self consistent groups, we could > resort to anyarray1/anyelement1, etc. Does this sound correct? > > Also, an implementation question: if I have a type oid for an element, > what is the preferred method for determining the corresponding array? > I'm thinking that the most efficient method might be to use the > element-type name with a '_' prepended to get the array-type oid, but > that seems ugly. Thoughts?
What about a cast? 1::arraytype Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
