On 11/25/2016 01:20 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
#checkpoint_flush_after = 0 # 0 disables,
# default is 256kB on linux, 0 otherwise
I find this pretty confusing, because for all other GUCs in the file,
the commented-out value is the default one. In this case that would
mean "0", disabling the flushing.
But in practice we use platform-dependent defaults - 256/512K on
Linux, 0 otherwise. There are other GUCs where the default is
platform-specific, but none of them suggests "disabled" is the default
While the 9.6 cat is out of the bag, I think we can fix this quite
easily - use "-1" to specify the default value should be used, and use
that in the sample file. This won't break any user configuration.
Although I understand the issue, I'm not sure about -1 as a special
value to mean the default.
Why? We use wal_buffers=-1 to use the default (depending on the size of
shared_buffers), for example.
If that's considered not acceptable, perhaps we should at least
improve the comments, so make this clearer.
Yep, what about not putting a value and inverting/adapting the comments,
maybe something like:
#checkpoint_flush_after = ... # default is 256kB on linux, 0 otherwise
# where 0 disables flushing
Yeah, something like that.
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: