On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> <5bih4k+4jfl6m39j...@guerrillamail.com> writes:
>>> pg_proc shows that now() is marked as restricted, but 
>>> transaction_timestamp() is marked as safe.
>> That's certainly silly, because they're equivalent.  I should think
>> they're both safe.  Robert?
> ... well, they would be if we passed down xactStartTimestamp to parallel
> workers, but I can't find any code that does that.  In view of the fact that
> transaction_timestamp() is marked as parallel-safe, this is a bug in 9.6.

Yeah.  Do you think we should arrange to pass that down, or change the marking?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to