Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Robert Haas wrote: >> So, one of the problems in this patch as committed is that for any >> process that doesn't show up in pg_stat_activity, there's no way to >> see the wait event information. That sucks. I think there are >> basically two ways to fix this: >> >> 1. Show all processes that have a PGPROC in pg_stat_activity, >> including auxiliary processes and whatnot, and use some new field in >> pg_stat_activity to indicate the process type. >> >> 2. Add a second view, say pg_stat_system_activity, to show the >> processes that don't appear in pg_stat_activity. A bunch of columns >> could likely be omitted, but there would be some duplication, too. >> >> Preferences?
> I vote 1. If we go with #2, there would immediately be a need for a union view, which would end up being exactly the same thing as the expanded display proposed in #1. Seems like the hard way, so I agree with Alvaro. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers