On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, one of the problems in this patch as committed is that for any > process that doesn't show up in pg_stat_activity, there's no way to > see the wait event information. That sucks. I think there are > basically two ways to fix this: > > 1. Show all processes that have a PGPROC in pg_stat_activity, > including auxiliary processes and whatnot, and use some new field in > pg_stat_activity to indicate the process type. > > 2. Add a second view, say pg_stat_system_activity, to show the > processes that don't appear in pg_stat_activity. A bunch of columns > could likely be omitted, but there would be some duplication, too. > > Preferences?
And now I'm noticing that Michael Paquier previously started a thread on this problem which I failed to note before starting this one: http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqSYN05rGsYCTahxTz+2hBikh7=m+hr2JTXaZv_Ei=q...@mail.gmail.com -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
