On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And now I'm noticing that Michael Paquier previously started a thread
> on this problem which I failed to note before starting this one:
> http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqSYN05rGsYCTahxTz+2hBikh7=m+hr2JTXaZv_Ei=q...@mail.gmail.com

Yes. I already had a look at what could be done to expose the
auxiliary processes in a system view with a set of proposals, though I
am not sure what would be better. It would be better to move the
discussion on this thread in my opinion, we are tracking down a
solution for a new problem.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to