Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> writes: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:26:24AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> One option might be for Postgres to define duplicate operator names >>> using ¿ or something else.
>> Are you sure that using a non-ASCII character is a good idea for an >> in-core operator? I would think no. > Eventually language designers will cross that Rubicon in mainstream > languages. And why not? Because it will create all sorts of character-set-conversion hazards. In the current design of Postgres it flat out would not work, because template0 has to be encoding-agnostic. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers