On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thoughts?
> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this.  If that
> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().

I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using
lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such.  This is getting a
bit ridiculous.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to