On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that > makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that > the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such. This is getting a bit ridiculous. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers