On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thoughts?
>> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that
>> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
>> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
> AFAICT the comment on LWLockRegisterTranche is confused; it talks about
> an allocated object being passed, but there isn't any.
Oops. Thanks, will fix.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: