Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that > makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that > the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
AFAICT the comment on LWLockRegisterTranche is confused; it talks about an allocated object being passed, but there isn't any. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
