On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > 2016-12-23 8:23 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >>>> Handling objects >1GB at all seems like the harder part of the >>>> problem. >>>> >>> I could get your point almost. Does the last line above mention about >>> amount of the data object >1GB? even if the "super-varlena" format >>> allows 64bit length? >> >> Sorry, I can't understand your question about what I wrote. >> > I thought you just pointed out it is always harder part to treat large > amount of data even if data format allows >1GB or more. Right?
I *think* we agreeing. But I'm still not 100% sure. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers