2017-01-04 10:23 GMT+05:00 amul sul <sula...@gmail.com>: > One more query, can we modify > BackgroundSessionStart()/BackgroundSession struct to get background > worker PID as well? I think since session always has a PID it's absoultley reasonable to return PID.
> I can understand this requirement could be sound useless for now, > because it only for the benefit of pg_background contrib module only. As far as i can unserstand BackgroundSession is not just a feature itself, it's the API. So PID would benefit to pg_background and all API use cases we didn't implement yet. I do not think that one PID in structure will waste huge amount of memory, cycles, dev time, readbility of docs, clearness of API etc. AFAIK the only reason may be if the PID is not always there. Best regards, Andrey Borodin. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
