On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > For additional entertainment, I include patches that integrate > background sessions into dblink. So dblink can open a connection to a > background session, and then you can use the existing dblink functions > to send queries, read results, etc. People use dblink to make > self-connections to get autonomous subsessions, so this would directly > address that use case. The 0001 patch is some prerequisite refactoring > to remove an ugly macro mess, which is useful independent of this. 0002 > is the actual patch.
Would that constitute a complete replacement for pg_background? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers