On 1/10/17 8:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
This seems like a sensible argument to me, but maybe somebody's got a
contrary viewpoint?

I suspect the number of users that use negative sequence values is so small that this is unlikely to be noticed. I can't think of any risk to "closing the hole" that you can end up with now. I agree it makes sense to sen the minimum value correctly.

Not sure if this necessitates changes in pg_upgrade...
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to