On 1/10/17 8:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
This seems like a sensible argument to me, but maybe somebody's got a contrary viewpoint?
I suspect the number of users that use negative sequence values is so small that this is unlikely to be noticed. I can't think of any risk to "closing the hole" that you can end up with now. I agree it makes sense to sen the minimum value correctly.
Not sure if this necessitates changes in pg_upgrade... -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers