On 01/12/2017 03:12 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 1/10/17 8:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
This seems like a sensible argument to me, but maybe somebody's got a
contrary viewpoint?
I suspect the number of users that use negative sequence values is so
small that this is unlikely to be noticed. I can't think of any risk
to "closing the hole" that you can end up with now. I agree it makes
sense to sen the minimum value correctly.
Not sure if this necessitates changes in pg_upgrade...
FTR I used them extensively in $previous_job to get out of a nasty problem.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
