Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hmm, we were discussing this stuff a few days ago, see > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > >> and commit 3957b58b8885441c8d03bc1cfc00e47cf8cd7975. Part of this code > >> duplicates that ... > > > > Is that bad? > > If you are expressing a concern about who wrote this code, I took > Amit's word for it that he did. I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently added routine rather than doing the same thing in a different way. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
