Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> >> Hmm, we were discussing this stuff a few days ago, see
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170109182800.qrkae62kmur3gfeg@alvherre.pgsql
> >> and commit 3957b58b8885441c8d03bc1cfc00e47cf8cd7975.  Part of this code
> >> duplicates that ...
> >
> > Is that bad?
> 
> If you are expressing a concern about who wrote this code, I took
> Amit's word for it that he did.

I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related
feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently added routine
rather than doing the same thing in a different way.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to