On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> >> I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related >> feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently added routine >> rather than doing the same thing in a different way. > > Oh, I see. Amit, thoughts?
Hm, perhaps. The code in map_partition_varattnos() that creates the map could be replaced by a call to the new convert_tuples_by_name_map(). In fact, it could even have used the old version of it (convert_tuples_by_name()). I guess I just aped what other callers of map_variable_attnos() were doing, which is to generate the map themselves (not that they ought to be changed to use convert_tuples_by_name_map). I will send a patch at my earliest convenience. Thanks to Alvaro for pointing that out. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
